About ITC
How do I grade
this? Designing rubrics for
multimedia projects
by: Joan Thomas and Kathleen Bennett Pervasive technology, with its new tools such as digital cameras
and wireless networks, extends the reach of human creativity.
Now educators have begun incorporating these tools into the learning
process, allowing students to exhibit their knowledge through
complex, interactive solutions.
Why would you incorporate multimedia projects into your assessment
structure? First, you are expanding the choices by which students
demonstrate their knowledge and their mastery in your course,
potentially engaging the learner at a deeper level. Second, you
are moving beyond traditional assessments such as multiple-choice
questions, essays, and the infamous 25-page paper of my graduate studies. Third,
you are modeling for them what the professional world will be doing: you allow
them to apply the professional practices and skills that will be required for
success in tomorrow’s world.
Traditional assessment happened in a defined space between a student and a
professor. With collaborative and problem-based learning becoming more prevalent,
the structure of assessment has changed. Your students may no longer be “writing” just
for you. A next generation assignment might contain four core elements:
- Subject
- Purpose/goal
- Media
- Audience
Media is the new element in this mix, and the rubrics/criteria
by which we examine projects that move beyond text are under
development. If the project can now be a series of Web pages,
a PowerPoint presentation, or a video, how are you going to assess
that project? How are you going to determine if the student has
provided evidence of mastery?
With visual, multimedia-based outcomes, both student and teacher need a core
understanding of the assessment standard upon which the assignment will be
judged. Both groups must also understand elements of visual literacy and multimedia
architecture. A common mistake of students in creating a digitally enhanced
project is the over-emphasis on the tool while neglecting the subject. The
technology should not impede access to the content; it should enhance the content.
As the instructor, it's easy to become intimidated by the latest-and-greatest
techniques that you may not have yet mastered. A rubric for technology assessment
could include any of the following areas:
Subject
This area would be the same as traditional, paper-based assessment and might
include:
- Thesis statement
- Logic and flow of paragraphs
- Authentic sources
- Persuasive writing
- Depth of understanding
- Supporting details
- Evidence of synthesis of ideas
Purpose
This could be derived by the professor or the student.
- Project meets the desired outcomes
- Project demonstrates mastery of the subject.
Scope
- Content covered to the depth and breadth required by the
assignment
Creativity and Vision
Subject addressed from a unique point of view
Appropriate Use of Media
- Effective use of the technology
- Enhances the exploration of the subject
- Media selected magnifies the subject
- Media consistent with professional models of practice
Navigation Through the Content
- Content clearly ordered
- Includes an introduction, supporting content, and a conclusion
- Navigational elements (buttons, links, etc.) consistent and easy to use
- Content relatively easy to proceed through
- Provided links assist in the movement through the content
Visuals
- Supporting images included
- Visuals engage the user rather than detract them from the content
- Font choices legible
- Text size easy to read
- Colors pleasing and complementary to the subject
- Readable length of text on each page
Audience
The audience is traditionally the faculty member. You may
have defined the audience as the students’ peers or a
mock boss or client.
- Language appropriate to the audience
- Project has the potential to impact the reader
- Colors and style are consistent with other types of media that speak to the particular target group or individual
Making the Most of Online Assessment
Mystery of the Rubric … Solved
How do I grade this? Designing rubrics for multimedia projects
Honesty in Testing
Project SET 2004
C3 2004 Call for Proposals
Assessment … Evaluation …
The CAT is out of the bag!
ShareIT (Sharing Ideas and
Technology for Teaching)
Students and faculty are getting STARTed
in January 2004!
2004 Teaching With Technology Grants Awarded
Principles of Good Practice for Assessing Student Learning”


